In 2015, 33.4% of all website traffic worldwide was generated through mobile phones. According to Mary Meeker’s report, 29% percent of people’s daily screen time is spent looking at smartphones.
No wonder advertising on mobile platforms is becoming more and more attractive for brands. By 2017 this market is expected to grow to $42 billion.
No wonder advertising on mobile platforms is becoming more and more attractive for brands. By 2017 this market is expected to grow to $42 billion.
Mobile user experience is becoming more and more important for publishers’ success. However only 30% of all websites are optimised for mobile devices right now. Some webmasters still ignore the fact that mobile traffic needs a different approach and try to monetise it with traditional “desktop” approaches.
Let’s see how traditional banner ads work on mobile devices and that the most common problems are.
To convert well the ad should be visible and attractive and it should encourage the intended click-throughs. The best format to meet these conditions for desktop was banner ads.
But as we see from the pictures above, traditional desktop banner ads do not look good on mobile.
But as we see from the pictures above, traditional desktop banner ads do not look good on mobile.
There are several obvious drawbacks:
- Banners can stay out of users’ field of view. They might simply be too small to notice.
- The image and call-to-action ares hardly visible due to limited space on the banner unit.
- Banners attract a lot of accidental clicks as they are placed mostly inside the content or near the navigation dashboard.
- Banner ads sometimes use reach media and Flash which are not supported by most mobile devices.
- If you have a mobile version of your site, you have to optimise every banner so that you do not reduce the quality of your vistors’ experience.ot to hurt userexperience of your visitors.
All these factors decrease the number of click-throughs you’ll get from your ads and so affect your final income.
Traditional banners are easy to create and user-friendly, but they are statistically less effective in the mobile environment than their full-screen analogues. Based on our publishers’ results, banners generate the least profit among all ad types.
So what should a publisher choose to engage mobile audience?
The most widespread alternatives to banners are Interstitial Ads and Dialog Ads (many of our publishers are successfully working with both formats already).
We’ve analysed the main performance indicators for traditional desktop and mobile banners and compared them with the results our special mobile ad units show (Dialog Ads & Interstitials).



Comments
Post a Comment